Just a short blog today before I leave for Elizabeth and Stu’s wedding party at the Urban Ecology Center. They were actually married on April 24th in Door County at Elizabeth’s brother’s house. I chose to redo their gift, thinking the third time would be the charm. It wasn’t. The spacing got squished toward the bottom, but it’s giftable.


I was out for three lunches this week: One with Anita whom I met at Señor Tomas. Then she decided to meet again the next day at Cafe de Art with our Coffee Sangha – Kathy Starck, Eileen Langyel and Peggy Bull. Anita was the surprise guest. We were all members at one time of the sangha that met at the UU Church in Waukesha. It has since disbanded.
I took lunch to Mickey yesterday. Unfortunately, the ribs were not fall-off-the-bone delicious, but she has enough leftovers for another lunch with friends, and she can have them baked a bit longer.
Stephanie Tsoris came for dinner and a sleepover on Friday. I made for her one of my favorite vegetarian dishes: black beans with corncakes. I also served the green and red tomatoes I had roasted earlier. Yes, those are peaches. The recipe calls for mangoes, but there were none to be found. The peaches worked perfectly – maybe even better.

We watched the movie Everything Everywhere All at Once. Part action film, part bad dream, very chaotic, but apparently with the deep message that kindness, love and connection heal us. Thanks AI.
Pedro and his crew came on Saturday and completed my to-do list. So, we’re all set for fall/winter. After my lunch with Anita in Hartland on Wednesday, I stopped over at Bambi’s. She told me she needed to thin out her strawberries, and I was happy to be the recipient of her thinning. Cesar, one of Pedro’s crew, created this lovely bed. It’s about 10 x 10. Now I have to get some netting. I don’t need to contribute to the chipmunks’ diet.

And look at this late bloomer. It didn’t really start to show any promise until a couple of weeks ago, and then it really took off.

Still no news from the literary agent. I co-wrote this article today with AI and submitted it to Substack. I see Trump as a virus that is challenging our immune system. So he will either kill us or make us stronger.
Here is a revised essay in a style suitable for Substack, with all sources cited at the end. Posting such content on Substack is acceptable as long as the work is original, provides proper attribution, and avoids violating the platform’s general and legal content guidelines.
Viral Politics: Trump and the Immune System of Society
Just as a human body must continually respond to viral threats at a cellular level, a society must face disruptive challenges at the political level. Both systems—biological and social—demonstrate how a single invasive force can provoke powerful, sometimes transformative, responses.
On a cellular level, when a virus invades, immune cells detect and react to foreign proteins. Cytotoxic T cells target and destroy infected cells, while helper T cells coordinate defense, activating more responders and releasing messengers that amplify the alarm. From this interaction emerges a vigorous immune response: the host’s entire system organizes to isolate, neutralize, and remember the invader for the future.
In the political “body,” Donald Trump can be compared to a virus entering a host. His influence rapidly spreads through media and social channels, carrying messages that stimulate strong reactions—loyal support from some, fierce opposition from others. As with a virus, Trump’s disruptive energy reveals vulnerabilities in the system. Long-simmering grievances, mistrust, and divisions quickly surface, much as a virus exposes weaknesses in a body’s immunity.
Society’s “immune response” to Trump has been complex and adaptive. Grassroots activism, new forms of resistance, and civil discourse act as antibodies, defending core democratic values and striving for societal balance. In some cases, these responses have strengthened the body social, fostering new alliances and a more alert, resilient public consciousness—much like immunological memory prevents future illness.
Yet, just as some viruses are neither wholly destructive nor entirely evil—they drive adaptation and evolutionary leaps—Trump’s impact is double-edged. While causing turmoil and polarization, his presence also exposes hidden faults and propels collective self-examination. In this way, he is both a symptom of pre-existing conditions (economic, cultural anxieties) and a catalytic cause of new responses, adaptation, and, potentially, growth.
Okay, that’s it. I have a party to go to.














































































































































